School Connection / Feature
Martyn’s Law: what schools should prepare before they spend
The DfE’s new education explainer gives school leaders a clearer starting point. Establish the premises, responsibility and procedures first, then decide what support or improvement the school needs.
A school can have a security policy, familiar equipment and a place for the subject on the governors’ agenda, yet still need a clearer account of what the new law will mean for its own premises. The important work is connecting those things: responsibility, people and arrangements that can be understood and carried out.
The new education guidance gives leaders a reason to bring that conversation together. Start by establishing the school’s position and the purpose of any improvement. That creates a much better basis for choosing support, approving expenditure and explaining the decision afterwards.
A clearer explanation, ahead of commencement
The DfE published its education explainer on 3 November. It is non-statutory guidance to be read with the Home Office’s statutory guidance. It gives school leaders a more specific route into the framework, rather than bringing the substantive duties into force through publication.12
The SIA currently expects commencement in spring 2027 and says the exact date will be confirmed. That creates a preparation period with a purpose: establish what applies, involve the right people and resolve uncertainty while there is time to do so carefully. An expected date should retain that status in the school’s plan.3
The useful leadership response begins with an explanation everyone can use. Governors need to understand the responsibility they are overseeing; staff need arrangements they can carry out. A purchasing deadline cannot substitute for either.
Start with the premises and the people, not pupil roll alone
Qualifying school premises with a reasonable expectation of at least 200 people present together, from time to time, receive standard-tier treatment even at 800 or more. Count the relevant staff and visitors as well as pupils. A small roll is therefore an incomplete answer to the scope question.1
For a trust, a central policy should help each school establish its position. The DfE distinguishes geographically separate schools from a group of nearby buildings. Shared management does not turn a national estate into one attendance calculation. Keep the premises and the evidence behind the expected numbers together.1
Independent schools share the school-specific treatment. References to privately funded independent training providers concern a different category. Where an estate has several uses or operators, establish the actual boundaries and control arrangements before drawing a conclusion. Our independent-school continuation follows that question through the school day.1
Keep legal responsibility distinct from the person organising the work
The DfE identifies the expected responsible body as the governing body for maintained schools, the academy trust for academies, and the governing body or, where there is none, proprietor for independent schools. The statutory role is determined by law and cannot simply be transferred to a contractor.1
Once the substantive requirements commence, qualifying premises will also need to notify the SIA. Include that future step in the preparation record and follow the regulator’s arrangements, rather than treating notification as an obligation already due.3
A business leader, estates director or security lead may coordinate preparation without becoming that statutory body. Make the distinction explicit in the meeting record. Who can approve the arrangements? Who will bring back the unresolved question? Which colleagues have to be involved for an agreed change to work?
That clarity gives outside expertise a useful place. The school can seek help on an identified issue, explain the authority for the work and retain ownership of the eventual decision. Buying advice should make accountability easier to exercise.
Bring the four procedures into the life of the school
The framework centres on evacuation, invacuation, lockdown and communication, with appropriate procedures in place so far as reasonably practicable. Their suitability depends on the premises and the circumstances. Home Office guidance connects this with the people expected to act, existing equipment, instruction and practising the arrangements.2
A useful school discussion follows one arrangement through the people who rely on it. Would a colleague covering a different role understand who makes the decision? Have communication and assistance needs been considered with the appropriate staff? Does an out-of-hours user understand the arrangements that apply to the space they use? These are preparation questions, not instructions for responding to an incident.
Schools can draw on the DfE’s existing protective-preparedness guidance, official templates and free ACT for Education resources. These are established support routes, not new publications this week. Use them to examine what the school already has and where understanding needs strengthening.56
Give any proposed spending a job to do
Home Office guidance does not prescribe physical alterations or particular equipment for public protection procedures. It also explains that an alteration may be reasonably practicable in particular circumstances. The school’s decision should connect a proposed improvement with the effectiveness of its arrangements. A universal equipment list would miss that judgement.2
Ask a provider to explain the problem the work addresses, what existing arrangements it will use and what the school will be able to check afterwards. Include staff time, maintenance, continuing costs and how the change fits the rest of the school’s safeguards. A quotation becomes easier to assess when its intended contribution is clear.
The absence of a prescribed standard-tier risk-assessment document under this Act does not remove existing school health and safety responsibilities. DfE’s standing security guidance already connects security risks, competent advice, safeguarding and business continuity. Keep those responsibilities visible alongside the new framework.421
Leave the next meeting with an owned decision
A written preparation record can help the school hold the discussion together without presenting the form itself as a legal requirement. Keep the understanding of the premises, responsible body and existing procedures beside the evidence, unresolved question and person taking the next action. Reference sensitive records in their approved location rather than copying their contents.
Sometimes the next action will be to clarify a boundary or obtain advice. Sometimes it will be to improve staff understanding, review an existing arrangement or commission defined work. What matters is that leaders can explain why the action follows from the school’s circumstances and how they will judge its result.
Our preparation guide provides a starting record for that conversation. Use it to reach a proportionate next step: a school that understands its position, knows what it can already rely on and can explain what still needs resolving before it commits further time or money.
Prepare your school’s next protective-security decision
Use this working record with the relevant leaders. Add your findings, evidence, actions and review dates, adapting the suggested responsibilities to your school.
Read the preparation guide and follow the five steps ↗
Download the editable review record (CSV)
Preview the review questions
| Review area | Suggested owner | Question to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Premises and use | Estates lead with governance support | Which premises and associated land are under review, what are their relevant uses and where is the evidence for that boundary held? |
| Expected simultaneous attendance | School operations lead | What is the reasonable greatest expected attendance at the same time, from time to time, including pupils, staff and visitors? Record the method, evidence reference and uncertainty. |
| Working scope and tier | Governance lead with advice where needed | What conclusion does the official framework support for these premises, including the school-specific standard-tier treatment? Which fact still needs checking? |
| Statutory responsible person | Governing body, trust or proprietor as applicable | Which body or person is identified under the statutory framework, and what supports that understanding? Record any need for clarification rather than selecting a convenient job title. |
| Preparation coordinator | Senior leadership team | Who coordinates the work, who may authorise changes and how will the accountable body receive decisions and unresolved questions? |
| Commencement and notification | Governance lead | Which current official source records commencement and notification arrangements? Spring 2027 remains expected, with the exact date to be confirmed. Record who will check the next update. |
| Four public-protection procedures | Relevant school and premises leads | Where are the existing evacuation, invacuation, lockdown and communication arrangements held? Which review or explanation is needed, with competent advice where appropriate? |
| Inclusion and staff understanding | Safeguarding and SEND leads with staff representatives | How are assistance needs and staff understanding considered? Reference approved records and identify the next review without recording personal pupil information here. |
| Boarding, lettings and other users | Operations lead with relevant activity operators | Which out-of-hours activities or other operators need coordinated arrangements? Record control and contract references, and any distinct premises or event question requiring advice. |
| Existing capability and free resources | Preparation coordinator | Which existing plans, staff capabilities, providers and official free resources can address the identified question? What useful evidence or capability remains missing? |
| Any commissioned work | Budget holder with relevant specialist advice | What defined need would the work address, what is included in the full cost and who will judge delivery? Distinguish a chosen improvement from a purchase claimed to be legally mandatory. |
| Acceptance and next review | Accountable body with the preparation coordinator | What has been established, what remains unresolved and who owns each next action? Record the evidence needed for acceptance and the date or change that will trigger review. |
This is a School Connection preparation tool for education settings in England, reviewed on 5 November 2026. It is not a mandatory risk-assessment form, a legal determination or a certificate of compliance. Suggested owners describe useful contributors, not the statutory responsible person. Keep pupil information, detailed vulnerabilities, access arrangements and operational security plans within approved school systems. Reference those records here without reproducing sensitive content. Existing safeguarding, health and safety and other applicable duties continue.
This blank record is completed locally. It does not submit information to School Connection.Bring the feature into your next conversation
Explain the school’s position, distinguish existing arrangements from unresolved questions and agree a proportionate next action.
Key points and questions for your school
- The new DfE explainer helps schools prepare; publication does not commence the substantive duties.
- Establish the relevant premises, expected simultaneous attendance and statutory responsible body.
- Connect any proposed improvement with a defined need, suitable expertise and evidence of the result.
- What evidence supports our understanding of the premises, expected numbers and responsible body?
- Which existing arrangements can staff explain, and which question still needs advice or testing?
- What decision will we make next, who will take it forward and how will we check the result?
Evidence and continuing coverage
Read the scope and limitations
- This is editorial interpretation and suggested preparation, not legal advice, a premises classification or a certificate of compliance.
- The DfE explainer concerns England. UK legislation and sources for different school responsibilities retain their separate scopes.
- Expected spring 2027 commencement is not an exact confirmed deadline. Check the latest SIA and Home Office announcements.
- No named school, site, equipment proposal or supplier was assessed. A suggested record is not a mandatory risk-assessment template.
- The standard-tier position under this Act does not remove other applicable safeguarding, health and safety, fire or equality responsibilities.
How this feature develops the earlier coverage
The 3 November education explainer adds a detailed school-facing account of scope, responsibility, procedures and support to our earlier campus coverage. Publication and expected commencement remain distinct.
A school campus with several uses needs a clear security responsibility map. Develops the October premises clarification with the DfE’s new education-specific explanation and a preparation route for all school types.1
What we will follow next
- The confirmed commencement date and final SIA regulatory guidance.
- Further official education resources and proportionate examples of preparation.
- Changes in premises, use, control or expected attendance that call for a fresh review.
Approved public intelligence
What the live evidence is showing now.
School Connection continues to monitor estates, energy & operational resilience evidence. New machine-detected signals remain private editorial candidates until a human editor investigates and approves them for publication.
This panel reads only the editor-approved School Connection public feed. It never exposes raw Observatory records, private candidates, contacts, commercial opportunities or internal scores.
Continue the evidence trail
Follow the question through the series
Sources and methodology
Evidence used in this analysis
School Connection links to the primary source behind each material claim. Source status, period and limitations are stated so readers can reproduce the evidence trail.
- 01
Department for Education · Published 3 November 2026; checked 5 November 2026
The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025: in education
Education-specific non-statutory explainer, 33 pages. Read alongside Home Office statutory guidance. Pages 5–13 address premises, attendance, school treatment and responsible bodies; pages 22–25 address events, other users and training. - 02
Home Office · Standing statutory guidance checked 5 November 2026
Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025: statutory guidance
Section 27 guidance. Chapter 7 distinguishes reasonably practicable procedures, equipment and documentation. Publication of guidance is distinct from substantive commencement. - 03
Security Industry Authority · Published 17 July 2026; checked 5 November 2026
Understanding Martyn’s Law and the SIA’s role as regulator
Regulator, scope, procedures and expected spring 2027 commencement. An exact commencement date remains to be confirmed in this source. - 04
Department for Education · Updated 3 July 2026; checked 5 November 2026
School and college security guidance
Standing England guidance on existing health and safety, competent advice, safeguarding, school security, testing and continuity. Separate from the new Act’s standard-tier requirements. - 05
Department for Education · Updated 28 April 2025; checked 5 November 2026
Protective security and preparedness for education settings
Standing non-statutory guidance with official self-assessment templates and linked ACT for Education resources. Its earlier date is retained. - 06
ProtectUK / Counter Terrorism Policing · Standing free resources checked 5 November 2026
Education Learning and Guidance
Free education resources and staff learning. Availability is not an endorsement of a commercial provider or a mandatory paid-training requirement.